Past Perfect

In Persian, the past perfect is constructed by the addition of the past copulas to the past participle. The stress falls on the last syllable of the participle (note that the construction of the past perfect is dependent upon the past participle).

We had said. gofte budim گفته بودیم
You had said. plural gofte budid گفته بودید
They had said. gofte budand گفته بودند
I had said. gofte budam گفته بودم
You had said. singular gofte budi گفته بودی
He/she had said. gofte bud گفته بود

The negative is constructed by the addition of the stressed prefix [-na] to the participle, as in نگفته بودم nagofte budam “I had not said.”

The past perfect, sometimes also called pluperfect, indicates that two actions took place—and completed—in the past, while one preceded the other.

By and large, the Persian past perfect corresponds to the English past perfect:

I had seen. dide budam دیده بودم
You had sat. singular nešaste budi نشسته بودی
She/he had gone. rafte bud رفته بود
We had eaten. xorde budim خورده بودیم
You had heard. plural šanide budid شنیده بودید
They had lived. zendegi karde budand زندگی کرده بودند

In many instances it is used in sentences in which the adverb “already” is used in English:

وقتی که رسیدم، آن ها شروع کرده بودند
vaqti ke rasidam, ān hā šoru’ karde budand
“When I arrived, they had already started.”
پیش از آن، آنجا را دیده بودم
piš az ān, ānjā rā dide budam
“I had already seen that place before.”
پارسال به اینجا آمدند، امّا سال قبل هم آمده بودند
pārsāl be injā āmadand, ammā sāl-e qabl ham āmade budand
“They came her last year, but they had already come the year before.”

With the adverb هنوز hanuz ‘yet, still’ and a negative verb in the past perfect clause, followed by the conjunction که ke ‘that, which, when’ sentences are constructed whose notion equates the idiomatic English, “scarcely had subject followed by a past participle verb…that/when…verb in the past absolute” or “no sooner had subject followed by a past participle verb…than…verb in the past absolute”:

هنوز ننشسته بودم، که در باز شد
hanuz nanešaste budam, ke dar bāz šod
“Scarcely had I sat down when the door opened.”
“No sooner had I sat down than the door opened.”
هنوز لای مجلّه را باز نکرده بودم، که آن را از من گرفت.
hanuz lā-ye majalle rā bāz nakarde budam, ke ān rā az man gereft
“Scarcely had I opened the magazine when he/she took it from me.”
“No sooner had I opened the magazine than he/she took it from me.”

Sometimes in an emphatic statement the order of the “when-clauses” is reversed. In this case, of the compound adverb وقتی که vaqti ke ‘when’ only ke is used and the emphasis falls upon the first clause. Generally speaking, this construction expresses the impossibility of the reversing an action which has already taken place (i.e., it is too late to undo it). Compare the following sentences:

وقتی که ما رسیدیم، آن ها شروع کرده بودند
vaqti ke mā rasidim, ān hā šoru’ karde budand
“When we arrived, they had already started.”
آن ها شروع کرده بودند که ما رسیدیم
ān hā šoru’ karde budand ke mā rasidim
“They had already started when we arrived.”
وقتی که من او را دیدم، شما به ایران رفته بودید
vaqti ke man u rā didam, šomā be irān rafte budid
“When I saw her/him you had already gone to Iran.”
شما به ایران رفته بودید که من او را دیدم
šomā be irān rafte budid ke man u rā didam
“When I saw her/him you had already gone to Iran.”
“You had already gone to Iran when I saw her/him.”